Quantcast
Channel: eFinancialCareersInvestment Banks – eFinancialCareers
Viewing all 3711 articles
Browse latest View live

J.P. Morgan M&A head: Female bankers must network better, be more mobile, and have “initiative” to reach the top

$
0
0

Like many young investment bankers, Ee-Ching Tay spent her early career setting herself up for a move into private equity. She achieved her goal: after three years as an analyst at Standard Chartered in Singapore, Tay joined PE giant Warburg Pincus in 1999.

But although Tay thrived on the buy-side, she says she soon missed “the thrill of working in IBD”. By 2003, Tay had returned to banking and taken on an M&A role, partly focused on the real estate and power and utilities sectors, at UBS.

“It’s unusual to leave and then go back to banking,” says Tay, who’s now head of Southeast Asia M&A at J.P. Morgan and is one of Singapore’s most renowned female bankers. “But the high pressure and the variety of the work means IBD is never boring. And for someone in their 20s, you get unapparelled responsibility in deals and client meetings.”

Her return to investment banking also saw Tay relocate to New York. “I loved working in the US on many levels. I specialised in M&A and in certain sectors earlier on than I could have in Singapore at that time,” she explains. “Living in a country as diverse as the US was also eye-opening. Client meetings in the Midwest were very different from those in New York, for example.”

Tay, who returned to Singapore in 2011 to join J.P. Morgan and currently sits on the bank’s diversity council, says “career mobility” – changing countries or job functions – is an often-overlooked way for female bankers to rise up the ranks. “Many gender diversity programmes in banking concentrate on improving work-life balance, which is a good approach, but I think mobility is equally important,” she says. “My bank encourages internal mobility for all staff, which I believe can really benefit our female employees by raising their profile and putting them in line for promotions. Our team in Singapore has people with experience from across the world. That’s very helpful because we’re working on more cross-border deals.”

J.P. Morgan was ranked as the top bank globally among female respondents in the 2018 eFinancialCareers Ideal Employer survey, which asked more than 6,000 finance professionals to vote on the companies they would most like to work for.

Don’t just rely on HR programmes

Tay stresses than women in banking shouldn’t rely on HR polices to reach the senior levels.  “Women bankers generally need to be more proactive about building strong internal networks outside their own teams – men have perhaps traditionally been better at this,” she says. “Your career is unlikely to move in a straight line, so it helps to know people in other teams, across IBD and the whole bank.”

Neither should mentoring be limited to formal programmes provide by banks. “Again, female bankers need to take the initiative and ask seniors – preferably in other teams – for career advice and mentoring,” says Tay. “Most MDs would actually love the chance to speak to a junior about their career. I’ve made sure I’ve always had mentors and they’ve helped me get where I am today. Mentors don’t need to be female – most of mine have been male.”

Women make up about half of J.P. Morgan’s 252,000 employees globally but only about 30% of its senior leadership. “Like most companies, we’re still some way off having 50% female representation at the senior level, and that’s why it’s important to have a pipeline of diverse candidates who can one day step into the top roles,” says Tay. “Gender diversity isn’t about ‘do we have enough senior female bankers now?’ – no bank has enough at the moment –  instead it’s about building the talent base for the future.”

That starts on campus. “The challenge is that many students, both male and female, don’t understand what bankers actually do. The potential female bankers of the future might not be studying finance or business,” says Tay. “That’s why my firm isn’t only sending MDs to talk to students at universities in Singapore. We’re now sending a larger number of junior bankers – people who the students can relate to and who can give them a realistic picture of being a young person in the industry.”

Female respondents who voted for J.P. Morgan as an ideal employer ranked it highly for its business prowess. ‘Financial performance’ was cited as a key strength of the bank by 71% them, while 70% perceived the firm to be an ‘innovator in the industry’.

“One of the reasons I joined J.P. Morgan is because of the bank’s strong global platform,” says Tay, who’s advised on more than 50 M&A and capital market transactions totalling about $90bn. “Ultimately, the way to make banking appealing to young women is to educate them that it’s now actually a very meritocratic industry – one in which you’re judged on your performance – and to show them career opportunities that meet their personal objectives.”



Morning Coffee: The new way of retiring from Goldman Sachs aged 30. “Silly hours” banker becomes firewalking life coach

$
0
0

Forget moving into private equity, or hedge funds, or even fintech – more young people are now making an early exit from Goldman Sachs and other large banks because they’ve already made a fortune from…cryptocurrencies.

While many senior bankers fear crypto could undermine the financial system – Jamie Dimon, in words he now regrets, famously called bitcoin a “fraud” last year – those lower down the pecking order have no such qualms. They see digital currencies as a means to generating enough money to leave their day jobs, reports Bloomberg. In March, Adrian Xinli Zhang made director at Deutsche Bank in New York aged just 29, but departed that same month on the back of his earnings from trading bitcoin in his spare time, sources told the news agency.

He is not alone. “I’m in a position where it doesn’t make sense to work at BlackRock anymore,” says Asim Ahmad, who poured his savings into Ether and then left his job at BlackRock’s London office. “The one-day volatility of my portfolio is higher than my salary, so if I get a few investments right then I’ll have made the same as my yearly wage and everything else on top is a bonus.”

At least three front-office staff members at Goldman in New York – including Jonathan Cheesman, 36, and Justin Saslaw, 28 – have quit the firm after making crypto windfalls, reports Bloomberg. Some young bankers are making money not just from trading the new currencies, but from taking advantage of market inefficiencies, including price variances on different exchanges.

What are these ex-bankers doing now? Perhaps unsurprisingly, some are setting up firms in sectors related to crypto. Zhang is reportedly working on a trading platform for digital assets, while Ahmad helps manage a fund that invests in blockchain businesses.

Although the total number of young bankers making large sums from digital currencies remains low, a crypto generation gap among finance professionals certainly appears to be opening up. “You’ve seen a bifurcation internally at many larger houses where senior managers are very skeptical about crypto, while graduates and younger team members are very positive,” says Adam Grimsley, co-founder of crypto hedge fund Prime Factor Capital. “The youngsters may have less intellectual baggage and may be more open-minded, but they also have less responsibility for managing risk and working out the practicalities of bolting on crypto to the existing business.”

Separately, crypto isn’t the only newfangled career option out there for bankers – you could try firewalking. Julius Cardoza spent more than 20 years at HSBC, including a stint as CEO for Belgium where he says he was “working silly hours”. Cardoza now runs a London life coaching firm – HSBC is among his clients – and teaching people to walk over hot coals is one of his services. “Firewalking is transformational for the rest of your life because after that there’s nothing you’re frightened of because you have already tested yourself to the limits of what you think you can achieve,” he explains.

Meanwhile:

The top 25 hedge fund managers earned an average of $615m in 2017. (CNBC)

Political turmoil in Italy is particularly bad news for European banks. (Wall Street Journal)

Umberto Giacometti, HSBC’s private equity co-head for Europe, has left for Nomura. (PE News)

Morgan Stanley’s $2 trillion dream. (Barrons)

UBS recruits the UK’s former EU commissioner as Brexit adviser. (Bloomberg)

Goldman Sachs is turning into a commercial bank. (Business Insider)

Meet the “J.P. Morgan of Europe”….BNP Paribas. (Bloomberg)

This year’s market turbulence brings back bad memories for traders. (Bloomberg)

James Gorman is just like LeBron James. (Business Insider)


Image credit: Tsoku, Getty

Pay at Citigroup Global Markets in Frankfurt vs. pay at Citigroup Global Markets in London

$
0
0

With Brexit still looming and Citigroup still intending to shift some sales and trading jobs from London to Frankfurt, the bank’s London staff might like to know how much they can expect to earn in the German city. The answer is, more than in London in terms of salary, but maybe less in terms of bonuses.

Citigroup’s German global markets business recently released its accounts for 2017. They reveal that the average compensation per head for the bank’s 274 employees in Frankfurt was 243k (euros) ($284k) for last year.

Citigroup Global Markets has yet to release its UK accounts for 2017, but in the last year for which figures are available (2016), average compensation for the 3,515 people at the bank’s comparable UK-based business was $277k. This was supplemented by an average share allocation of $64k, bringing the total average pay in the UK to $341k; 20% more than in Germany.

Citi plans to relocate 150 to 200 sales and trading and related jobs to the UK as a result of Brexit. In the latest accounts for its German markets entity, the bank confirms its intention to transform Citigroup Global Markets Germany into a “securities trading bank” for the eurozone. Citi will expand its “equity, fixed income and FX product ranges…as well as derivatives,” says the report. Commercial banking and securities services roles are being moved to Dublin.

Citi is already understood to have a large trading hall in Frankfurt which is only partly used.

For the moment, Citi’s German global markets business comprises a combination of corporate and investment banking (€81.5m in revenues last year), markets and securities services (€ 73.4m in revenues) and treasury and trade solutions ( €21.1m in revenues). Although the London business doesn’t split out pay by division, it’s almost certainly more skewed towards sales and trading – a disparity that likely explains the higher average pay.

Even so, there are indications that Citi’s Frankfurt business pays a similar amount at the highest level. Pay for material risk takers (senior staff and significant traders) at Citigroup Global Markets in the UK averaged $1.2m in 2016. By comparison, the seven members of Citi Global Markets’ German executive board earned an average of €1.1m ($1.3m) for last year.

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com
Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)

““

Another member of J.P. Morgan’s data science team has quit

$
0
0

As we noted last week, people keep on leaving J.P. Morgan’s data science and machine learning division. The latest exit is an up-and-coming junior who demonstrates how quickly you can progress in data science careers now.

Gleb Dobrov, a manager in J.P. Morgan’s Intelligent Solutions business has left for BCG Gamma, the data analytics unit of Boston Consulting Group, according to his LinkedIn profile.

Dobrov, who studied an MBA at Cornell University with a focus on managerial finance, only joined JPM in September 2016. He was responsible for finding ‘data driven solutions’ to the bank’s problems. Before JPM, he spent over three years working in data and digital strategy at Cap Gemini.

Writing in the introduction to J.P. Morgan’s 2017 annual report, Daniel Pinto, head of the corporate and investment bank (CIB) said the bank will be spending $10.8bn on technology this year, up from $9.5bn last year. However, Pinto said the bank’s digital transformation team is comparatively small, at just 2,500 people.

Dobrov was a “delivery manager” at J.P. Morgan. At Cap Gemini he was a “managing data scientist.” He joins BCG Gamma as a senior data scientist. – Not bad for someone who left college in 2013.

As we reported last week, J.P. Morgan’s intelligent solutions business appears to be going through a period of change. Insiders say the team, which was led by Len Laufer, the multimillionaire founder and CEO of Argus Advisory and Information Services, is being dispersed across business units and that Laufer is leaving along with various other key J.P.M. machine learning and data science professionals.

In place of J.P.M Intelligent Solutions, Samik Chandarana, the former credit trader and J.P. Morgan veteran, was made head of data science and analytics in the corporate and investment bank in October 2017. The bank also hired-in Manuela Vesolo, head of the machine learning department at Carnegie Mellon University as head of artificial intelligence research in May. Both Vesolo and Chandarana report into Sanoke Viswanathan, chief administrative officer of J.P. Morgan’s corporate and investment bank.

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com
Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)

““

Why banking will inflate your ego. And what to do about it

$
0
0

Everyone thinks it’s the money that will get you in banking. It’s not. The money is not even that good in banking any more and it was never conspicuous anyway – you never exactly knew who was making it on your team. But you always knew – and you know still, who is above you in the hierarchy.

Banks are hierarchical places. When you work in a bank, you know where you’re ranked: you’re an analyst, you’re an associate, you’re a vice president, or a director or an executive director or managing director (MD). Some of the world’s most successful contemporary organizations have flat structures. Banks don’t: banks love hierarchies. When you work for one, you will begin to be defined by your place in them.

Hierarchies are the source of ego in the banking industry. When people move up a layer, they change overnight. Colleagues who were only to happy to chat with you, will suddenly insist upon receiving emails once they’ve got a new business card. Friendly VPs who would talk by the coffee machine will declare that you must, “put something in the diary”. It’s more than just a new title; it’s a new personality.

Banks could always ditch their hierarchies and become flat organisations like Tesla or Apple, but instead they seem to move in the opposite direction. Although places like Deutsche Bank are talking the talk about taking out layers of management, my experience of working in them has been that layers are usually added in. I’ve worked in teams where new managers have inserted new layers of bureaucracy which have seriously undermined productivity: decisions have to be signed-off by all sorts of people up and down the ladder; people who used to collaborate won’t together because they’re conscious of their own positions. Everyone needs to maximize and broadcast their personal achievements if they’re to progress to the next level.

Banking hierarchies stink. They insidiously undermine your humanity. Watch out.

Of course, there’s something you can do. You can forget that you’re a VP or a D or simply an associate; you can interact as a person. You need to remember that banking is a small world. You’re a managing director talking to a vice president or director today, but you might meet that subordinate in a different context tomorrow. If you abuse your power now, you will be remembered for it later.

I know this, because it happened to my ex-boss. He milked me for as much work as possible and subjected me to a combination of fear and ridicule every time bonuses were paid. Eventually, I left. The next time we met – years later – I was his client. Suddenly I was the big man and he was the sweaty, shifty-eyed underling asking for my patronage.  When he noticed I was on the team the room was filled with his surprise and panic. Of course, we didn’t give him the account. Why would we? What goes around comes around – whether you’re an MD or not.

Emile Dermaut is the pseudonym of a salesman at a U.S. bank in London

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com
Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)

““

Morning Coffee: Deutsche Bank – the final humiliations. Don’t get too excited about a return of prop trading

$
0
0

While Germany’s soccer team heads for the World Cup as joint favourites, its national champion in the investment banking industry continues to be somewhat less of a source of national pride. The Wall Street Journal revealed that the Federal Reserve has assigned the bank’s US operations to “troubled” status, a regulatory sanction which triggers all kinds of invasive action, including requiring senior-manager hiring and firing decisions to be approved by the Fed. The share price has fallen to all-time lows and the CDS spread has widened sharply.

It is even a little worse than that, as the Financial Times points out. Deutsche actually has two major regulatory badges of shame; while the Fed thinks it is “troubled”, the Federal Deposit Insurance Commission regards Deutsche Bank USA as a “problem” bank. Last, the FDIC published statistics indicating that although the number of “problem” banks in the U.S. had fallen, their assets had increased by roughly the size of a single large bank. In the market speculation as to what the identity of that bank might be, the forecasting maxim “It’s Always Deutsche” appears to have proved to be accurate. Although “trouble” with the Fed has apparently been going on for over a year, the “problem” with the FDIC is more recent, the status having been acquired during Q1.

The company has put out a press release commenting only on the WSJ story, not directly denying it but claiming that the regulatory relationship is confidential and that Deutsche has “resolved” a number of outstanding allegations. Deutsche also makes it clear that any troubled or problem status only refers to its US entities, not to the parent company in Frankfurt.

It is easy to make an educated guess at the root cause, given the newsflow. The Fed and FDIC both rate banks using a system called “CAMELS”. It’s an acronym for Capital, Asset Quality, Management, Earnings, Liquidity and Sensitivity (to market risk). In the case of Deutsche Bank’s USA subsidiaries, the problem is unlikely to be Capital or Liquidity, because both of these are underwritten by the parent Deutsche Bank AG back in Germany. It’s also unlikely that there is much of an issue of Asset Quality, as Deutsche in the USA is not much of a lending bank. But the other three …

Sensitivity to market risk is always going to be a regulatory concern given the size of Deutsche’s trading operations, but the Fed has had concerns dating back to 2013 that the reporting and accounting systems aren’t good enough for Deutsche to be fully in control of the risks that it’s taking. This is also a Management issue, as are the conduct fines that Deutsche has racked up in the USA, for Volcker Rule compliance failures and Russian mirror trades, among other issues. And as for Earnings, the weakness of the North American investment banking franchise was one of the key reasons why it is having staff numbers cut.

And although the corporate press release points to the “resolution” of four enforcement actions, it does not appear that the problems are anywhere near to being all in the past. Only two months ago, during the last days of the John Cryan era, Deutsche was called into the Fed for what was reported to be an unusually blunt meeting in which ultimatums were delivered about overdue improvements. Christian Sewing has reiterated Deutsche’s commitment to the U.S, but given the circumstances it seems likely that people will wonder if this is a relationship which is possible to save.

Separately, there was happier news for the trading industry from the Fed in its proposed changes to the Volcker Rule. However, it doesn’t seem that we should expect prop desks to be back in the hiring market any time soon. While welcome to the industry, the actual rule changes are about reducing compliance costs, not permitting anything which was previously forbidden. The key points all involve changing the burden of proof in certain situations; no longer will a holding period shorter than 60 days be taken as prima facie evidence of prop trading, for example. It is likely to be easier to build inventories, as the cost of proving to the Fed that they are not being used for proprietary purposes will be lower. But we won’t be seeing bank employees competing against the hedge fund rich list and client flow trading will still be where the action is for the foreseeable future. As if to underline this, Bank of America poached David Kim, the head of equities flow trading, from JP Morgan and Credit Suisse has started cutting rates trader jobs to emphasise electronic trading.

Meanwhile

JP Morgan rises to first place, Citigroup falls to fifth in the Euromoney FX Survey as short term swap volumes are removed from the methodology. (Bloomberg)

Goldman Sachs VP charged with insider trading. (Reuters)

James Gorman disagrees with George Soros on whether another global crisis is imminent. (Bloomberg)

Jamie Dimon is still the highest paid CEO in banking, up 4% on last year. (Fortune)

Goldman is still aiming for rapid growth in its Marcus consumer brand. (Bloomberg)

Mike Corbat talks strategy, technology and Citigroup. (Seeking Alpha)

Goldman Sachs hires two female executives from the harassment scandal-hit BoA prime brokerage. (NY Post)

Image credit: sharrocks, Getty

Â

Surprise as Deutsche Bank lays off healthcare bankers in London

$
0
0

As it continues to cut costs under new CEO Christian Sewing, Deutsche Bank is understood have made deep cuts to its healthcare investment banking team in London. Both Deutsche insiders and headhunters confirmed the cuts, which one recruiter described as, “carnage.”

“No one has been spared,” said one DB insider. “They’ve made cuts across the board, both seniors and juniors.” A junior on the healthcare team confirmed that the cuts spanned the entire hierarchy and said they were, “unexpected.” The actual number of exits is unclear, however. Deutsche will retain a presence in healthcare and has not cut the team in its entirety.

Deutsche declined to comment. The exits are understood to include Darren Campili, Deutsche’s global head of healthcare, who joined the bank in 2006.

“The cuts seem to be completely arbitrary,” complained a senior banker. “It’s madness.”

However, the cuts to healthcare probably shouldn’t have come as a surprise. Sewing has said several times that he intends to pull back from some areas of corporate finance, particularly those in which the bank does not have strong representation with European and particularly German clients. So far this year, Deutsche ranks 15th for EMEA healthcare M&A according to Dealogic. Employees of the bank said previously that the London healthcare team employed around 14 people.

The layoffs come after Sewing said Deutsche plans to make most of its front office layoffs by July 2018. The bank intends to eliminate 7,000 jobs in total as it seeks to restore profitability.

As we reported last week, Deutsche is consolidating teams in the investment banking division as part of its cost-cutting exercise. Analysts, associates and VPs in London, Madrid and Milan are being placed into a single pool. So too are juniors covering resources, infrastructure and utilities, and then healthcare, consumer and retail. It seems healthcare bankers are getting the thin end of the wedge as the latter team is formed.

Some seem to have anticipated this eventuality. James Heath, a former Deutsche MD who spent less than two years with the bank after joining from EY in 2016, quit in March, and now works for BTG, a specialist in interventionist medicine. Other DB healthcare bankers may now be wishing they’d intervened sooner in their own careers too.

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com
Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)

“”
Â

French bankers want to leave London – when they have children

$
0
0

So much for Brexit. While the date for the break remains fixed for March 2019, give or take a transition period, and while organisations like Paris Europlace continue to campaign for the French capital’s claim to become Europe’s financial centre, French bankers themselves are still keen on London.

Or at least, they’re still keen on London until they start a family. Then, everything changes.

So says one Parisian headhunter, speaking on condition of anonymity. “It’s when French bankers start families that they start to think about coming home,” he says. “They start to fear that the cost of educating their children is going to explode.”

A French analyst in London agrees, adding that some of his more experienced associate-level colleagues are already returning to Paris for this reason.

The Lycee Francais, London’s French language school costs £7k to £11k in fees and is heavily over-subscribed. It doesn’t help that the pound has depreciated 20% against the euro since 2015, making money earned in London worth less back home. Mid-ranking bankers who might previously have hung on in London for a few more bonus rounds now have less to look forward to.

If French bankers in their late 20s and early 30s are eyeing their homeland with renewed appreciation, however, French bankers at the start of their careers are still enthralled by the City of London.

Olivier Bossard, director of the Masters in Finance at HEC and Philippe Thomas, professor of finance at ESCP Europe – two of France’s most prominent finance academics, say London is still the prize for their students. “London will remain Europe’s central finance hub for many more years,” says Bossard.

In fact, French students have no choice but to come to the City if they want to build banking careers. Michael Ohana, founder of “Alum Eye”, an organisation which helps prepare students for corporate finance interviews, notes that most large banks still locate most of their summer interns in the City of London – and that summer internships are what lead to full time jobs.

This situation will probably change as teams shift out of London and hire interns in mainland Europe, says Ohana. However, there’s little real sign of this happening yet. For the moment, therefore, it’s still London or bust – and back when your children are old enough to go to school.

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com
Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)

““


What I learned working with Millennials at Morgan Stanley & Goldman Sachs

$
0
0

If you’re a young person in an investment bank, you’re a high achiever. You’re probably also keen to make an impression and to advance up the banking hierarchy.  I know: I’ve been there myself – I spent over eight years in banking, first at Goldman Sachs and then at Morgan Stanley. There’s often something special about the people who make it finance; if you want to be one of them you’ll need to cultivate the right approach.

1. Be passionate about your goals but be patient on your way to achieving them

It is important to stay focused on one’s long-term goals, but it is even more so to be 1) flexible with the approach and 2) patient with the timeline. Don’t obsess with a very detailed multi-year plan. A few months down the line you will have new information that will make any such plans obsolete. Instead, shift your focus to completing your immediate tasks well, to taking one more micro step towards growing as a professional. If all you can think of as an analyst is to become an associate, you will become frustrated very quickly.

2. Come in with a giving attitude and an abundance mindset

You can add much value doing tiny things. When I joined Goldman Sachs, one of my daily responsibilities was food delivery for my team. On a hectic day, I was the difference between my team eating or not through the day. Over time, that helped me bond with the pack, and it made everyone want to invest time in my growth. Demonstrate your work ethic and your drive even before learning how to open excel.

3. Learn how to interact with your team effectively

Everyone is different. Some people don’t want the details. Some others can be micro-managers. Some others are susceptible to internal politics. Some are very defensive of their clients. It is not personal.

Your team won’t adapt to you. It is your responsibility to learn how to manage people’s differences effectively. Always assume that people do things for their reasons and not yours.

4. You are responsible for your own learning

Perception is reality. So ask all the questions you need, but ask them only once. You can buddy up with a friendly senior analyst who can go over some of the more complicated things more than once.

Don’t wait for people to tell you what should know. Own your learning. When I started, I did most of my research once the markets closed. Then, I would engage with my traders and spend hours playing with some of our modelling tools, so I could put my learning to work with clients the following day when the markets opened.

5. Be the driver of innovation in your team

As a young analyst, you can bring some disruption to the way that things are done in your group. You can bring a fresh approach to the industry “modus operandi”. So forget about the “this is the way things work around here” and help the team use new tools or processes to become more effective.

In summary…

Be aware of the value you can add with tiny things, from the get-go. Even by disrupting an obsolete work-flow in your team. Own your career development, so you can add increasing value as you grow. Be ready to give more than you take as you progress, and your team will have your back. And keep your focus on the weekly action, trust the process and let promotions come to you as a result.

Rafael Sarandeses is a former head of institutional FX sales for Southern Europe at Morgan Stanley. He now runs an advisory and investment firm in Africa and is a visiting lecturer at IE Business School. 

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com
Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)

““

Morning Coffee: The story of the silly banker and sensible secretary. The new route to a $200k starting salary in finance

$
0
0

There exists a reasonable expectation that successful bankers are good with money. After all, younger bankers who’ve raked in millions of dollars in a relatively short period of time have been specifically trained to understand the key principles of finance. Yet time and again, bankers, traders and brokers make the same mistakes as many others who’ve hit a rush a money only to find themselves destitute.

A banker with lousy personal finance habits appears, at least on the surface, to be a bit of a paradox. Not so, says Morgan Housel, partner at investment firm the Collaborative Fund and a former columnist at the Wall Street Journal. “That’s because investing is not the study of finance,” he wrote. “It’s the study of how people behave with money.”

To showcase his point, Housel broke down the story Grace Groner, an orphan and career secretary who lived a humble life that took her to age 100. Despite all the bills that come with old age, she left $7 million to charity when she died in 2010. Then there’s Richard Fuscone, former vice chairman of Merrill Lynch’s Latin America division who declared personal bankruptcy within weeks of Groner’s death. The Harvard-educated man who retired in his 40s with $66,000 monthly mortgage payments was soon overcome with debt after a period of heavy borrowing and several illiquid investments.

Housel uses the two stories to highlight several behavioral normalcies that can affect people who experience an influx of money, no matter their educational background. Financially successful people, particularly those who do well younger in life, tend to underestimate the role of luck and timing, instead tying their successes directly to their abilities. Experiencing financial success can lead to overconfidence and massive overspending – two clichés often associated with bankers in their 20s and 30s.

Early financial success can also make people susceptible to seeing the riches of older colleagues and wanting to measure up. “When most people say they want to be a millionaire, what they really mean is ‘I want to spend a million dollars,’ which is literally the opposite of being a millionaire,” Housel wrote. “This is especially true for young people.”

One recent study found that the neighbors of lotto winners are 7% more likely to declare bankruptcy in the following three years due to “conspicuous consumption” and investing in risky financial assets. While the grass is always greener for everyone, there are some particularly nice lawns on Wall Street for up-and-coming bankers to compare to. Most people don’t want to live like Grace Groner. Heck, many financiers appear to not even want to live or invest like Warren Buffett. The hare can hold more allure than the tortoise.

Elsewhere, hedge funds that are starving for data scientists have started building relationships with top universities, similar to the recruiting strategies of investment banks. Man Group has even co-founded a research facility with Oxford University that has led to a host of hires.

The competition for data scientists has resulted in the wild growth of pay packages, according to the FT. Hedge funds are paying top master’s students $90k-$120k to start while committing salaries of as much as $200k for entry-level PhD grads. And that’s not even including bonuses.

Meanwhile:

Deutsche Bank Chief Executive Christian Sewing wrote a memo to staffers who have not (yet) been given the axe, telling them not to be discouraged despite all the job cuts, the bank’s historically-low share price and the recent lowering of its credit rating. (Bloomberg)

Wells Fargo’s post-Brexit plans reportedly involve moving some of its London operations to both Paris and Dublin. (FT)

Artificial intelligence appears to be touching every business in banking. Morgan Stanley used AI to create more personal emails for its wealth management clients based on scans of social media and other online sources. (Barron’s)

The European division of hedge fund giant Caxton Associates slashed pay – and its management fee – after a disastrous 2017. (City AM)

Raj Bhattacharyya, Deutsche Bank’s head emerging-market debt and foreign-exchange in the Americas, is leaving the firm after 17 years. (Business Insider)

City stockbroker Oriel Securities, owned by U.S. investment bank Stifel Financial, is adding headcount to its equities, debt financing and M&A advisory businesses. (FT)

Citigroup spent $8 billion, or more than 20% of overall expenses, on technology in 2017. The bank plans to increase that number this year. J.P. Morgan is expected to spend $10.8 billion in 2018. (WSJ)

Commissions paid by asset management firms to banks and brokers decreased by 28% in the U.K. during the first quarter following the introduction of MiFID II rules. (FT)

A former J.P. Morgan wealth manager is suing the firm for racial discrimination after he was allegedly asked to move from the firm’s Manhattan office to its Harlem branch, where he would be “best-suited” because he is “black,” according to the complaint. (NY Post)


Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: btuttle@efinancialcareers.com
Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by actual human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t).

““

David Solomon has got his own ideas about strategy and hiring at Goldman Sachs

$
0
0

David Solomon has spoken. Last week, the CEO in waiting at Goldman Sachs made his first presentation to investors at the Bernstein Strategic Decisions Conference.

There, Solomon outlined his ideas for Goldman’s future. They were mostly a continuation of the strategy presented last September by Harvey Schwarz, the CEO candidate Solomon defeated. They were also similar to the strategy referenced by still-current CEO Lloyd Blankfein in his recent shareholder letter.

However, there was some unique Solomon spin in the presentation too. As Goldman hires-in record numbers of executive directors and VPs in its pursuit of $5bn in additional revenues, the intentions of its CEO-incumbent are worth dissecting in detail. – Especially as Solomon said the extra $5bn is “far from” Goldman’s only ambition and alongside the Marcus consumer lending platform, Goldman wants to “broaden [its] core business”, “expand [the] franchise,” and “enhance” the “growth and the diversity of our revenue stream.”

Here’s how Solomon said this will happen.

Solomon is all about investment banking

As is to expected from someone who rose up through the ranks in Goldman’s investment banking division (IBD), Solomon is big on investment banking. Schwartz’s plan said Goldman should get an extra $0.5bn+ from IBD. Solomon didn’t contradict this; he did point to historically high growth rates which seem to suggest the opportunity could be larger still.

Since 2012, Goldman’s IBD revenues have risen 50%, said Solomon. He added that Goldman’s investment banking pipeline is currently at a record high (whereas activity in the sales and trading business declined in the second quarter of 2018). In pursuit of the $500m of extra IBD revenues Solomon said Goldman launched an initiative to add 1,000 investment banking clients two thirds of them in America. He added that the firm has made “20 senior lateral banking hires” in the past year to help achieve this, and that 60% of the new clients have been covered already.

Goldman said last November that it wants to expand its penetration of mid-market corporates in the U.S.. Solomon reiterated the firm’s intention of connecting with corporate clients and noted that two thirds of the firm’s on Goldman’s list are backed by private equity investors.

Solomon is all about the synergies between investment banking, debt capital markets and private capital 

While IBD as a whole has grown at Goldman, the debt capital markets (DCM) debt underwriting franchise has been a star performer. And the alternative capital solutions group, which raises private capital for clients, has been the starriest performer of the lot.

Solomon noted that Goldman went for growth in DCM in 2012 and has since upped its revenue share in that business by almost 50%. He noted that this in turn has fed through to Goldman’s strength in M&A, as the firm has been able to use its DCM franchise to help fund clients’ M&A deals.

At the same time, Solomon noted that Goldman successfully built an “alternative capital solutions group” over the past 18 months, and that this has enabled the bank to raise private capital for clients in an environment where the market for initial public offerings (IPOs) has been constrained. Debt interest income from Goldman’s investing and lending division has risen three times since 2012. This too has helped fund M&A deals.

Solomon didn’t exactly say so, but the implication is that investing and lending and DCM bankers will be at the front of his shopping list (along with corporate coverage professionals).

Solomon is all about technology to improve client experience

Financial News reports today that Goldman has been hiring “aggressively” in London and Warsaw for its Marquee team, which is building technology that will allow clients to access Goldman’s SecDB pricing and risk database directly. The new recruits include technologists and strats. 

SecDB is the baby of Goldman CFO Marty Chavez rather than Solomon. But Solomon is supportive. “We continue to invest in technology platforms that allow us to better serve our clients’ needs and improve the strength of our position in those businesses,” he said.

Solomon is all about flow rather than structured products

When top junior traders left Goldman Sachs earlier this year, they complained to us that they were leaving because Goldman was shifting away from complex structured products towards more of a flow trading mentality, and that “flow people” are therefore ascendant.

Solomon confirmed last week that this is entirely intentional. “Our business historically fixed incomes have been focused around the bespoke structured solutions and derivative transactions,”  he said, adding that Goldman is moving in favour of, “cash business, flow business and electronic platforms.” In fixed income currencies and commodities (FICC), flow trades accounted for 68% of the total at GS last year – up from 55% in 2007. Cash trades accounted for 51% of the total, up from 35% in 2007.

Solomon is all about systematic trading and electronic platforms

In line with Blankfein and Chavez and just about every other bank on the street, Solomon is pushing systematic trading. He pointed to Goldman’s new bond pricing engine and algorithmic corporate bond trading facility, which he said can now make quotes for 10,000 securities (up from 7,000 last summer) on lot sizes of up to $2m. In fixed income, he said electronic trades accounted for 13% of the total last year, up from 3% in 2007.

Solomon intends to expand in corporate equity derivatives

As Goldman goes for an extra $500m of revenues from equities, Solomon said the firm is particularly pursuing revenues in corporate derivatives. It currently ranks fourth in this market, and therefore has an opportunity to grow. Solmon added that Europe and Asia are seen as having particular potential – which helps explain Goldman’s recent big equity derivatives sales hires in London and Paris. 

Solomon suggests there will be more new leaders in securities

Lastly, Solomon suggested that the recent exits of Pablo Salame and Isabelle Ealet which left Ashok Varadhan as the sole head of Goldman’s securities business, were not the end of the matter.

Even before Salame and Ealet left, Solomon said Goldman was in a “transition” in terms of the heads of its securities business, with seven people in leadership positions. The exits of Salame and Ealet mean that some of Goldman’s “younger leaders” are now being ‘transitioned up,’ said Solomon.

The younger leaders Solomon referred to would seem to be the five executives who signed the memo announcing Salame and Ealet’s retirement alongside Varadhan. These were: Paul Russo, Michael Daffey, Justin Gmelich, Jim Esposito and Julian Salisbury.

The implication is that Varadhan will not remain sole head of the securities business and that one or more will be promoted alongside him. The race is on.

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com
Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)
“”

Nomura’s moving fewer than 100 London employees to Frankfurt

$
0
0

Nomura has joined the banks moving sales and trading staff from London to Frankfurt because of Brexit. However, the numbers affected will be small.

Reuters reported on Friday that Nomura has got a new securities licence for Frankfurt. The Japanese bank’s new trading business will be located in “Nomura Financial Products Europe GmbH.” However, Nomura informed us that it has limited intention of adding staff to the new unit.

“We expect a small proportion of employees – less than 100 – to move from London to Frankfurt,” said a Nomura spokeswoman. Not all the positions will be filled with ex-Londoners. “We will make some adjustments on site,” added the spokeswoman, who declined to discuss how many people are likely to be hired locally.

London-based Nomura International employed around 2,300 people in the year to March 31st 2017. 2,166 worked in the United Kingdom, 117 worked in the rest of Europe and 21 were in the Middle East.

Nomura’s not the only Japanese bank setting up a Frankfurt base post-Brexit: Japanese bank Daiwa has chosen the German city too. 

A German headhunter who wishes to remain anonymous said Japanese banks have begun hiring front office staff in Frankfurt – unlike U.S. banks which are still focused on filling middle and back office jobs in the city.

In addition to the new “Nomura Financial Products Europe GmbH”, Nomura already operates “Nomura Asset Management Germany GmbH,” which has 33 employees.

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com
Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)

““

A brief guide to getting a job at Greg Coffey’s new hedge fund

$
0
0

Greg Coffey is definitely back. He of the smouldering looks and shoulder length hair has achieved returns of 4.6% in the seven weeks since his new macro emerging markets fund, ‘Kirkoswald Capital’, started trading according to the Financial Times.. Accordingly, the FT says Coffey’s former protégé and ex-employer Louis Bacon of Moore Capital, will be doubling his investment in Kirkoswald, which initially received commitments of $2bn from all its investors.

With more money, Kirkoswald may yet need more staff. If you want to work with Coffey, however, it will help if you have one special attribute: you will either have worked with him before, or been employed by one of his former employers.

The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority Register reveals that Kirkoswald currently employs six registered people in addition to Coffey. All but one of them have worked where the man himself worked before he took early retirement to spend more time with his family in 2012.

Coffey’s new colleagues include: investor relations professional Patricia Martin, who was with Coffey at GLG Partners and Moore Europe before joining Kirkoswald in February 2018; head of execution, James Saltisi, also formerly of GLG and seemingly an old friend of Coffey’s; COO Bob Price (ex-GLG), portfolio manager Stuart Atkinson (ex-Moore); head of business development Richard Blake (ex-Moore); and head of operations Robert Price (ex-GLG).

The only FCA-listed Kirkoswald employee not have an ex-employer in common with Coffey is Jeremy Power, an ex-Citi associate who switched into hedge funds in 2006 and has since worked for Jabre Capital, Aviate Global and Abbeville Partners.

The prevalence of Coffey’s former colleagues is not entirely the result of individual hiring decisions. Martin, Saltisi, Price and Power all came from Abbeville Partners, an equities fund set up by Saltisi in 2013 and backed by Coffey during his time in retirement. Abbeville changed its name to Kirkoswald in January 2018.  Even non-Abbeville recruits come from Coffey’s former employers though: if you haven’t worked for GLG, it helps to have worked for Moore.

Coffey worked for GLG from 2003 to 2008, and then for Moore from 2008 to 2012. He decided to throw it all in aged 41 and to spend more time with his wife and three children in London, Australia, and on the Scottish island of Jura (population 190), where he owns a 12,000 acre estate and golf course.

While a job at Kirkoswald may involve team trips to Jura, it’s also likely to come at a price. Before his retirement, Coffey was known for taking multiple trading screens on family holidays and for churning his portfolio. – In 2008 he was rumoured to have turned over his $5bn portfolio over an average of 2.8 times a day. After six years out of the market, Coffey’s trading habits may have changed. But with fears of another debt crisis in emerging markets, this may yet prove wishful thinking.

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com
Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)

““

Pros and cons of working at a boutique investment bank

$
0
0

The recent spike in M&A activity means that boutiques are hiring, both at the senior and junior level. Senior investment bankers likely know the deal with boutiques: there’s more risk; there’s more potential for reward; and you’ll need a hoard of close client relationships to be successful. For junior bankers, deciding between a bulge-bracket bank and a boutique can require more thought, particularly if you are coming straight from undergrad or post-grad studies.

The biggest difference between the two isn’t necessarily size. Evercore is one of the better-known boutiques and it employs more than 1,600 people, for example. In fact, some established firms like Evercore and Moelis & Co. are pushing back on the term boutique, preferring “M&A independent bank,” according to Andy Pringle, managing director of headhunter Circle Square. That’s unlikely to stick, if we’re being totally honest.

What makes boutiques unique is the limited number of services they offer, the most important being major financing. As such, boutiques rely on rainmakers – advisors with strong relationships with clients who prefer to hire bankers over banks. Working closely with rainmakers is a major advantage, says Logan Naidu, CEO of banking recruiter Dartmouth Partners. You’ll develop closer relationships, have more client contact and work in a more collegiate atmosphere.

That said, the niche nature of the business can limit growth opportunities in different areas (like ECM and DCM) that are available at large banks, including global rotations, Naidu said. The training may also not be as good at many boutiques and the firm may be shut out of larger deals due to a lack of lending capabilities – the most obvious con. Many deals require full-service investment banks. It’s that simple.

Others feel the niche focus of boutiques can open future career opportunities that may not be available to junior bankers at larger firms. “Niche sector teams line up very nicely for juniors to move into private equity and venture capital,” said Pringle.

He also noted that boutiques can shelter younger staffers from some of the more brutal day-to-day aspects of working at a traditional bulge-bracket bank. They tend to offer a better work-life balance; there’s less of a “hire and fire” culture; and, because boutiques often work with sell-side firms, juniors don’t spend near as much time putting together large pitch books that may never even be read.

The work at boutiques is “70% or 80% execution and the origination is more intelligent than the ‘volumes of data is king’ model” that bulge-brackets may employ, Pringle said. One of the chief complaints of junior bankers who quit – outside of the hours – is putting in weeks of work on deals that are never even considered.

Perhaps the biggest downside of boutiques, other than the issue surrounding financing, is the lack of brand awareness, though some firms are making strides here. “There is a feeling of working at a tier-1 bank that can’t be replicated,” said one current U.S.-based MD who asked to keep his firm anonymous. It’s easier to become a rainmaker at a boutique by first developing relationships with big-name clients while working at a large bank – and then switching firms – rather than trying to move up the ladder at a boutique, he suggested.

As an example, Evercore hired six senior managing directors from outside the company last quarter while promoting just seven and moving on from five, according to Buckingham Research. You’ll likely never see such a ratio at a large investment bank that will do more promoting from within. Many boutiques are known for their “hired gun” philosophy in filling out the top ranks of their hierarchy.

Ironically, it may be easier to become a senior MD at a top boutique by not starting your career there. It’s hard to bring in new business when you have the same rolodex as your boss.

Compensation is complicated

Pay can oftentimes be better at boutiques that have fewer restrictions over compensation, said James Mitchell, an analyst at Buckingham Research. Clawbacks are a rarity and many boutiques tend to pay bonuses in cash, he said. The numbers from Wall Street Oasis tell a similar story, with the top 10 largest bulge-bracket banks paying their first-year analysts, on average, a slightly larger salary than their counterparts at boutiques, yet boutiques make up the difference, and more, with larger bonuses. (It’s worth noting that the numbers only include the top handful of boutiques).

At the top, compensation is a bit more murky. Several boutiques have switched from a more traditional commission-based structure to a shared bonus pool where MDs are judged on factors like talent development and the inclusion of other lines of the business, making their pay more subjective. How much that has changed things is up for debate. We were told last year that one firm disappointed analysts by carving out a larger share of the bonus pool for MDs to make sure they were happy.

Like anything in banking, pay depends on the firm, the role and performance.


Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: btuttle@efinancialcareers.com
Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by actual human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t).

““

J. P. Morgan’s newest tech hire has the sort of CV that should make bankers scared

$
0
0

J. P. Morgan’s got a new technology recruit with the sort of resume that should make bankers think twice. He’s a serial entrepreneur, and he’s worked for a major hedge fund.

Rusty Conover, former vice president at the hedge fund Two Sigma, joined JPM as an executive director in its New York office last month. Although it’s not clear what exactly he will be doing at JPM, Conover’s profile suggests he’s the sort of exciting person most bankers might aspire to become. – He’s worked in finance, and e-commerce and publishing and media and fashion.

Conover worked for hedge fund Two Sigma until February 2018. There, he was the tech lead for a team which worked on a platform that executed quantitative simulation workloads for Two Sigma research.

His LinkedIn profile says he designed and implemented large-scale, secure, and robust caching framework that could store tens of petabytes of data and provide hundreds of gigabits of bandwidths to applications without any additional resources.

Before and during his time at Two Sigma, Conover set up four companies in 12 years. They include: InfoGears, an e-commerce-cum-CRM platform for businesses, where he serves as the CTO; GearBuyer.com, an online platform for comparing prices for outdoor gear and electronics; Lucky Dinosaur, a live video streaming, encoding, and distribution platform; and ParrotSnap, a cloud-based platform to save, organize and search information in Microsoft Excel.

Conover joins JPM as an executive director – one notch below MD. He suggests the era of entrepreneurial students becoming mere bankers is drawing to an end. Now, the most entrepreneurial student are technologists who join banks’ tech divisions instead of the front office.

Conover is J.P.M.’s latest senior tech recruit. In March, Ranjit Samra, former chief information officer of corporate services technology at Credit Suisse and Myron Wieneke, former head of technology services at Bridgewater Associates, joined the firm as managing directors.

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com
Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)

““


Morning Coffee: What banks’ top quants say about their jobs today. SocGen-Unicredit merger could save billions

$
0
0

As banks become increasingly focused on the integration of data analysis and machine learning in their daily affairs, the concerns of their top quantitative minds should be the concerns of everyone in finance. The quants are shaping the future.

Today’s top finance quants were out in force at the recent Quant Minds Festival in Portugal’s Lisbon. They reflected on how their role is changing and the new challenges facing their profession. Saeed Amen, a former quant who developed systematic trading systems for Lehman Brothers and Nomura, was in attendance and has written a helpful summary. 

Firstly, Amen says being a quant is increasingly about machine learning. John Hull, a professor Derivatives and Risk Management at the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto who’s known for his book on derivatives pricing, said his students are now learning about machine learning and its ability to infer relationships that are non-linear.

Emanuel Derman, the former Goldman Sachs and Salomon Brothers quant who’s now a professor at Columbia University made a presentation on valuing derivatives using a replication approach (if you can’t value an asset, replicate it with assets that can be valued), and said that derivatives modelling is changing as the focus moves towards modelling ‘underliers’ and market microstructure (how market structure and design effect market behaviour and the way in which products are exchanged). Market microstructure can be analyzed by machine learning and Rama Cont from Imperial College presented on this.

Some of the most interesting presentations in Lisbon, however, were from big name quants at work in banks today. Amen says Michael Steliaros, the Goldman Sachs quant who’s hiring for the bank’s quant execution team, presented on the theme of optimizing execution in the context of a large stock portfolio. Managing transaction costs were becoming ever more important, said Steliaros, adding that it’s important to understand the correlations within a portfolio when executing trades. These correlations can impact risk at the level of a portfolio. Steliaros said they are typically higher at the end of a day.

Alongside Steliaros, Nick Baltas, head of systematic trading strategies at Goldman Sachs, spoke about  ARP (alternative risk premium strategies) and how they’re impacted by crowding. Amen said Baltas suggested there are two main types of ARP: the first based on risk sharing/premia (for example carry) and second based on price anomalies/behaviourally driven (like trend). Risk sharing tends towards negative feedback loops; price anomalies tend towards positive feedback loops. Baltas said it’s hard to measure “crowdedness” and that its impact tends to depend upon whether volumes are rising or falling.

Also present was Jan Novotny, an eFX quant at HSBC (who spoke on the use of KDB for machine learning) and Stefano Pasquale, head of liquidity research at Blackrock (who spoke on the use of machine learning to develop a framework for liquidity risk management). Welcome to the future.

Separately, although SocGen has disavowed its intention of merging with Unicredit and a merger of the two would likely be unfeasibly complex, a report in the Financial Times suggests a merger could make sense. Analysts at Kepler Chevreux have calculated that a UniCredit-SocGen deal could yield €2.7bn of cost savings, because of overlaps in the groups’ investment banking units, eastern European operations and in Germany, says the FT.  Jean-Pierre Mustier has reportedly been pushing it for months. Don’t dismiss the concept too soon.

Meanwhile:

Goldman Sachs chairman: “We are hiring more in artificial intelligence, not just in Goldman Sachs but in general at all banks.” (The Trade News)

Unicredit boss Jean-Pierre Mustier has a stuffed animal mascot called Elkette which is supposed to represent the bank’s transformation and to foster belonging and inclusion. Lloyd Blankfein and Jamie Dimon have both cuddled it. (FiNews)

Mustier carried the can for the scandal involving Jérôme Kerviel, the rogue dealer. Without this, Mr Mustier might well be running SocGen today. (Financial Times) 

How to get ahead at Carlyle: “At the core of our culture is a demand that we push each other, that we perform, and that we respect each other.” (Bloomberg) 

KPMG is cutting up to 400 jobs in South Africa. (Financial Times)

Credit Suisse hired a Deutsche Bank equity analyst in Australia. (AFR) 

Microsoft to ruin Github. (Financial Times)

Jerome Leleu, Morgan Stanley’s co-head of Asia Pacific equity capital markets, has died aged 41. (Bloomberg) 

Ex-Deutsche Bank analyst has been involved in a succession of scatological start-ups. (Dealbreaker) 

Ex-banker wants to warehouse uranium. (Telegraph) 

Mary Meeker’s big internet trends report for 2018. (Recode) 

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com
Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)

Â
““

Disillusionment at Deutsche Bank after yesterday’s IBD town hall

$
0
0

With the bank’s share price at record lows and an endless litany of bad press, Deutsche Bank’s senior management are trying to shore-up morale. Last week, CEO Christian Sewing declared that everyone was “sick and tired of bad news” and emphasized Deutsche’s strong capital ratios and ample liquidity reserves.  Yesterday, Alasdair Warren, head of the investment bank in EMEA gave his monthly town hall along with overall head of Deutsche’s corporate and investment bank, Garth Ritchie. If Sewing healed wounds, Warren and Ritchie – but especially Ritchie – seem to have opened them again.

Deutsche Bank isn’t commenting on the investment banking division (IBD) gathering, but attendees have complained that they came away feeling more put out than when they went in.

At issue seems to be a remark of Ritchie’s to the effect that it doesn’t matter if Deutsche cuts too many staff in its quest to cut costs because it can always hire people back again in future. “He basically told everyone in the room and on the conference call that each and every one of us is a free option as far as he is concerned,” complained one senior Deutsche corporate financier.  “It’s pretty funny actually: we are told by managers earning millions per year that all of us who earn literally a fraction of their pay are free options. It makes total sense but is thoroughly demotivating,” he added.

Alasdair Warren’s own contribution doesn’t seem to done much to palliate Ritchie’s message. “Warren just told us to keep working hard,” said the banker. “It was the same old hackneyed phrases.”

Deutsche’s investment bankers aren’t immune to the 7,000 layoffs in Sewing’s plan, of which around 2,200 are expected to affect front office jobs in the next month. Sewing has made it clear that he intends to cut corporate financiers in teams not related to European clients. Deutsche already closed its Houston office, shut down the oil and gas team, laid off multiple people in healthcare and combined junior and mid-ranking staff up to VP level in larger teams (North and South Europe have been unified in DB’s world, along with natural resources, infrastructure and utilities, and then healthcare, consumer and retail.)

In the circumstances, Warren and Ritchie’s presentation might have been expected to rally the troops. Instead, it seems to have done the opposite. “It reminds me of a sign of a skull and crossed bones I saw in an ice cream shop once; under it was written: ‘The beatings will continue until moral improves,'” said the disgruntled senior banker. “There is no incentive to work here and management knows it.”

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com
Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)

““

This is who gets jobs at Goldman Sachs and the world’s top hedge funds now

$
0
0

In case there were any mistake about this year’s hiring priorities in financial services, Goldman Sachs and ExodusPointCapital have just made things a little more clear: it’s all about hiring people with expertise in systematic trading and adding technologists who can construct trading and risk management systems.

Goldman and ExodusPoint’s two newest hires typify the zeitgeist. GS just recruited Silviu Vlaseanu from BNP Paribas as an executive director for its systematic trading strategies team. ExodusPointCapital just recruited Kanav Devesher, the former head of EMEA rates trading IT at Citi, as the head of its European trading applications.

Vlaseanu is a quant who started out in algo development at Cheuvreux in Paris. Devesher who started out as an application support analyst at Bank of America in London. Neither has a traditional trading background and yet each has landed one of the hottest seats in the securities industry.

Vlaseanu’s arrival at Goldman comes as the firm focuses on flow products as its seeks to rebuild its market share in fixed income currencies and commodities trading. In a presentation last week, incoming Goldman CEO David Solomon said flow products accounted for 68% of trades at Goldman last year, up from 50% in 2007. Solomon reiterated Goldman’s focus on systematic trading and praised the firm’s algorithmic bond trading system. It probably helps that at BNP Paribas, Vlaseanu was in charge of building execution algorithms for the French bank’s FX marketplace.

ExodusPoint, meanwhile, seems to be busy building a quant trading platform. The fund, which was the largest ever hedge fund start-up with at least $7bn in assets under management raised from the outset, was set up by Michael Gelband, the former star trader at  Izzy Englander’s Millennium Capital. It is already understood to have 125 employees, mostly in a skyscraper off Park Avenue in Manhattan. A London office led by former Bluecrest head of investor relations Simon Dannatt was opened in April 2018, and appears to be hiring.

Alongside Dannatt, senior people at ExodusPoint in London include counsel and head of compliance Christopher Neus (formerly of Perry Capital) and COO Enrico Corsalini (formerly of Millennium and Nomura). As well as Devesher, the fund has hired Benjamin Filippi, a former manager of the quant business at Millennium to build its quant trading platform, Karim-Olivier Sadli, a senior quant strategist from Mako investment managers, and Stephan Winklbauer, a quant analyst and developer from defunct hedge fund Hutchin Hill. Non quant hires include: Alessandro Cipollini, a former macro trader from Hutchin Hill, Demetrio Rojas, an ex-equity derivatives trader at Citi, and Egor Avdeev, a rates trader who previously worked for Millennium but mostly recently worked at Astor Ridge and Argentiere Capital.

ExodusPoint reportedly plans to, ‘trade across multiple markets in the multi-manager model.‘ Based on recent hires, this seems to imply building a quant trading system and hiring portfolio managers focused on particular products to work alongside. An Asian office is to follow soon.


Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com
Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)

““

Are these the worst sorts of firms to work for on the buy-side?

$
0
0

Struggling finding work on the buy-side? There are many alternatives to private equity firms and hedge funds that are currently desperate for talented investment pros. Whether you really want the job is the real question.

Pension funds, endowments, sovereign wealth funds (SWFs), foundations and other institutional investors are struggling to find quality investment talent, according to a new study. Nearly 60% of limited partners (LPs) in private equity firms cite the lack of high-quality recruits as a significant barrier to improving their returns – the second most common response behind “scale of resources,” a potentially paired issue. Nearly all the LPs included in the research by Coller Capital have over $1 billion in assets under management, with more than 30% controlling $50bn-plus.

The report didn’t break down the individual reasons for the recruiting struggles, but headhunters tell us it’s all about the two P’s: pay and politics – both literally and figuratively concerning the latter. Sovereign wealth funds are known to pay poorly compared to traditional private equity firms, a reputation that was fleshed out in our recent Ideal Employer survey. A job at a state-owned investor also tends to be accompanied by plenty of bureaucracy and red tape. Plus, you won’t find offices in desirable locations like London or New York. The work-life balance may be a bit better, however.

Working at private and public pension funds can provide similar frustrations, according to one buy-side recruiter who asked to remain anonymous. The oversight and scrutiny can be intense. “Imagine having one million bosses, many of whom consider [their pension] to be their only source of income but who don’t know the first thing about investing,” he said.

Public pension funds controlled by legislators are known for capping compensation, along with the massive public outcry that can accompany a dip in performance. Expectations often clash with the average rate of return, particularly considering the conservative approach pension funds are supposed to employ.

Earlier this year, the $151 billion Texas Teacher Retirement System’s pension fund received pushback when it looked to lower its assumed rate of return from 8% to a still-lofty 7.25%, with retirees pointing to the bull market of the last five years as they questioned the decision. Public pensions are also chronically underfunded, adding additional pressure to managers. Some private equity firms have even turned away investments from pension funds because they can be inconsistent and difficult to work with.

Then of course there is the issue of compensation, which is managed by a board of trustees. The Arizona State Retirement System currently caps bonuses at 25% of annual salary, as an example, a far cry from what investment managers take home in the private sector. One can see why famed investor and author John Mauldin once titled a piece: “Mamas, Don’t Let Your Babies Grow Up to Be Pension Fund Managers.”

Meanwhile, the environment at endowments and foundations tends to be a bit more comfortable, as the money doesn’t belong to any one individual. Still, fund managers face somewhat similar consternation over pay considering the investments are donations, said the headhunter.

Look no further than the owner of the world’s largest endowment.: Harvard University. Jack Meyer ended a nearly 20-year run as Harvard’s endowment head in 2005 following alumni backlash over the compensation of his top performers, despite generating annual returns of more than 15% for over a decade. Meyer took his top three employees with him to start a new firm.

Jane Mendillo, who led Harvard’s endowment fund from 2008 to 2014, was heavily chastised for her conservative investment strategy, leading to speculation that she was pushed out. Two years later, a group of incredulous alumni wrote a letter to Harvard’s board, demanding a full accounting of the endowment, starting with the pay allocated to fund managers.

Maybe Harvard’s alumni have a point, however. While they typically pay their endowment head over $10 million a year and several other managers well into seven-figures, the endowment manager at a small school in Wisconsin whose rate of return has bested the Ivy League titan over the last decade makes just $250k a year. A hedge fund likely would have come calling if he didn’t just invest in indexes.


Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: btuttle@efinancialcareers.com
Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by actual human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t).

““

Why the most juvenile bankers love Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan

$
0
0

University students and recent graduates are a fairly conservative bunch when it comes to choosing employers. They want to work for banks (with the big names at the top), professional services firms, McKinsey and Google. So says our 2018 Ideal Employer survey of the companies 20-25 year olds find most attractive: the top three are all banks, with Goldman Sachs in the top spot.

Asking people in this age bracket which company they’d like to work for is quite different to asking any other group. More than any other list in our survey, this is about how companies are perceived and how they brand themselves, because a significant proportion of 20-25 year olds will have no first hand experience of actually working for the businesses in question. Think back to when you were a second year undergraduate – what did you really know about the world of work?

This probably explains why Goldman is number one. It is shorthand for “bank” or “high paying graduate employer” in the way that McDonald’s is shorthand for fast food restaurant. It’s also an example of all publicity being good publicity. Sure, Goldman gets a lot of flak, but you rather suspect the only thing worse than being called a “vampire squid” would have been one its competitors being singled out for this dubious honour.

Here, it is telling that only seven percent of graduates thought Goldman a good corporate citizen – and only 50% thought this important. Perhaps, if, in your early 20s, you’re planning to work for the vampire squid, making a positive difference to the world is not your primary concern.

Name recognition likely explains Google’s prominence too. So why isn’t Google number one? After all, it was ranked the world’s second best brand by Interbrand in 2017 and is far better known than any bank. This may be because there is still a perception that Google is an employer only for those with science, maths and tech degrees, whereas anyone can work in a bank.

Familiarity is also probably the reason PWC and Deloitte score so well (despite being, perhaps a little staid and grey compared to some of the other firms in this list). These two put a huge effort into marketing themselves to graduates. They may also seen as rather easier to get into than Google or Goldman, and so might attract people who do not see Goldman as a realistic proposition.

Deutsche Bank came out eighth in our survey – despite saying recently that it has 619 graduate jobs, for which it received 110,000 applications in 2018.  If DB received that quantity of applications, the implication is that other banks had far, far more.

Interestingly, graduates across the board say that perks such as gym membership and snacks are important. It’s tempting to say that this is because they’re young and easily impressed by shiny baubles. But actually this is a simplistic reading of the situation. Graduates know that these companies often have long hours cultures and so recognise that having a gym and a great cafeteria in the building are genuinely important. Here too we can point to Silicon Valley which is largely responsible for the idea that great perks and being a great employer go hand in hand.

Conversely, graduates seem to think that few companies offer great prospects for promotion – and nor do they attach much importance to it. Again, it would be easy to chalk this up to the callowness of youth. In fact, it’s a very savvy assessment of how the world works. Nowadays, most people only stay at their employer for four or five years and organisations are pretty flat. To get a significant promotion or salary hike means moving to another company.

Here it also makes sense that graduates see training as more important than promotion – because you take learned skills with you when you leave.

Contrary to the accepted wisdom about Generation Z, our survey found a general ambivalence about flexible working. This, we can probably can put down to youth. When you’re in early 20s and and have few responsibilities and children are a prospect so distant as to barely register, being able to come in late or leave early sometimes is unlikely to seem like a valuable perk. It notworthy too that women find flexible working far more valuable.

However, there are some genuine surprises when it comes to factors like businesses offering challenging and interesting work. The stars here are Google (which is to be expected) and PWC and Deloitte (which also makes sense as they offer variety. Yet Blackrock also scores higher than any of the banks which is something of a surprise. Why? What is it that makes investment so much more interesting than banking? Weirdly, McKinsey & Co. comes second from bottom. This is a surprise as a big part of “the firm’s” pitch that it offers tough, but intellectually stimulating work.

Similarly surprising is Google’s low score as an industry leader. But then maybe not. Perhaps, for these early Generation Z employees, Google is already part of a dull and monolithic establishment – little different to Microsoft – and the real industry leaders are the likes of Facebook, WhatsApp and Snap, Inc. Either way, organisations themselves will soon find out.

View the complete 2018 eFinancialCareers Ideal Employer Rankings

““

Viewing all 3711 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>